December webinar: The Complex Ring of Jingle Bells
Dear RP friends,
Research Office webinar season continues! The December webinar on the 19th was on The Complex Ring of Jingle Bells, with our speaker, Maximilian Primbs.
Maximilian Primbs is a fourth-year PhD candidate at the Behavioural Science Institute of Radboud University in Nijmegen, the Netherlands. He is also the Assistant Director for Translation and Cultural Diversity at the Psychological Science Accelerator. His research interests include implicit bias, prejudice reduction, stereotypes and visual perception, statistics and meta-science, and open science. He is interested in how social and cultural environments shape attitudes and beliefs.
Primbs discussed findings from his recent research endeavour in the study called The Complex Ring of Jingle Bells: The Effects of Christmas on Implicit Bias Towards Racial, Religious, and Sexual Minorities. The research itself included two studies: one analysing data from Project Implicit, which found increased bias against Black, Arab, and darker-skinned individuals during Christmastime, and another controlled experiment that contradicted these findings. It highlights the complexity of implicit bias and suggests that significant cultural events like Christmas can influence biases. However, the results challenge the Bias of Crowds model, indicating that changes in implicit bias may be more related to sample characteristics than situational contexts.
Implicit bias refers to the attitudes or stereotypes that affect our understanding, actions, and decisions unconsciously. These biases are culturally ingrained and can be activated in specific situations, influencing behaviour without conscious awareness. Further, the Bias of Crowds model posits that changes in social contexts can lead to changes in implicit bias, largely independently of the individual decision-makers within those contexts. The model suggests that features in the environment can increase the accessibility of concepts linked to those features, thereby influencing implicit bias. The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a psychological assessment tool used to measure implicit bias. It involves categorizing images or words associated with different categories and words as good or bad. For example, participants might categorize faces or names as belonging to certain racial or ethnic groups and associate them with positive or negative words. The differences in reaction times during these tasks are used to calculate IAT D-scores, which are interpreted as reflecting levels of implicit bias.
The analysis revealed increased implicit bias towards Black people, Arab people, and people with darker skin tones, and decreased bias towards Muslims, Jews, and sexual minorities during Christmastime. These findings suggest that Christmas affects implicit bias. Still, the study also raises the possibility that these changes might be due to selection effects or unobserved variables rather than genuine effects of the social and cultural environment. The potential for selection effects refers to the possibility that changes in implicit bias observed in the study might be due to differences in the characteristics of the sample rather than genuine shifts in social contexts. This means that specific individuals might self-select into the sample at particular times, such as during Christmas, which could influence the results. If these selection effects are not accounted for, they can lead to misleading conclusions about the causal impact of social contexts on implicit bias. In the future, adversarial collaboration, which is a form of cooperation where opposing views come together to jointly advance understanding of the disputed area, is a good solution.
The study’s findings significantly impact the Bias of Crowds model, suggesting that implicit bias is better explained by sample characteristics rather than social contexts, challenging the model’s assertion on the latter. Future research must control for demographic changes when analyzing large databases like Project Implicit. Strong a priori theories are needed for testable predictions and establishing conditions for bias models. Additionally, the study cautions that large datasets may show correlations that don’t imply causation and recommends formal causal inference methods in cases where experiments aren’t feasible. These findings underscore the necessity for robust experimental designs and theoretical frameworks to understand implicit bias dynamics in social and cultural contexts settings.
The study’s exploration of how Christmas affects implicit bias connects to broader societal issues by highlighting the influence of cultural and religious events on social attitudes. Christmas, as a significant cultural and religious event, brings about notable changes in people’s social, cultural, and demographic environments, which can temporarily alter implicit biases. By recognizing that cultural and religious events can impact implicit attitudes, policymakers and social leaders can better design interventions and policies aimed at reducing bias and promoting inclusivity. This research adds to the discourse on how societal norms and events can perpetuate or mitigate bias, emphasizing the need for awareness and proactive measures to foster more equitable social environments.
EFPSA Research Office webinars continue – follow our pages and join us for our next webinar.