{"id":1238,"date":"2026-07-29T17:21:00","date_gmt":"2026-07-29T17:21:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/more.efpsa.org\/rpblog\/?p=1238"},"modified":"2026-07-29T17:21:00","modified_gmt":"2026-07-29T17:21:00","slug":"self-help-addiction-recovery","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/more.efpsa.org\/rpblog\/2026\/07\/29\/self-help-addiction-recovery\/","title":{"rendered":"Self-Help Practices in Addiction Recovery: How Identity Influences Personal Growth"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Help-Seeking in Addiction Recovery<\/h1>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Recovery from addiction isn\u2019t just about quitting\u2013it\u2019s about rediscovering and reshaping who you are. Your identity influences every step, from relying on your own willpower to seeking support from others or finding meaning through community and spirituality. At the same time, the recovery process itself transforms your sense of self, building strength, purpose, and resilience. In other words, overcoming addiction is as much about changing habits as it is about changing identity.<\/p>

Addiction is a chronic condition characterized by episodes of relapse even after treatment has begun, with many years often required before achieving stable abstinence (Dennis et al., 2005). Thus, recovery from addiction is a complex process that involves attaining psychological, physiological, and social well-being\u2013the individual manages to abstain from use, improves their mental health, and reintegrates into society (Laudet, 2007). This journey can be shaped by both internal (personal) and external (social) resources (Inanlou et al., 2020). On a personal level, success is influenced by psychological factors such as self-acceptance, hope, responsibility, identity formation, and the ability to manage trauma, while socially, support comes from family and the community. Social integration is strengthened through participation in meaningful activities such volunteering, which offer a sense of belonging and a clear purpose (Shdaifat et al., 2025).<\/p>

To better understand how recovery works and why it differs from person to person, Egunjobi (2020) proposes a model suggesting that help-seeking is not chaotic but follows a hierarchy based on an individual\u2019s resources. The first level is self-help, where the person acknowledges the problem and attempts to address it independently. This relies on willpower, self-commitment, and personal strategies to avoid the addictive substance or behaviour. The next level involves relational help, where the person realizes they cannot cope alone and turns to close others. This stage is based on acknowledging vulnerability and seeking support from trusted individuals. The third level is professional help, where the individual accepts the situation and becomes willing to seek assistance from experts (medical interventions, psychotherapy, specialized counselling) to obtain information and resources that neither they nor those close to them possess. The final level is represented by transcendental or divine help, which the person turns to when they feel that all other methods have failed, placing their hope in a higher power or in destiny.<\/p>

Thus, recovery is a gradual, individualized process grounded in self-help strategies, where setbacks at one stage should not be viewed as hopelessness or incapacity but rather as motivation to move to the next level and access new resources. Also, according to the model (Egunjobi, 2020), the person starts at a lower level of help (the personal level) until they manage to find the resources needed for recovery, without necessarily having to go through all four stages to recover.<\/p><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

The Dynamics of Recovery: Connecting Internal and External Resources<\/h1>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Behavioural transformation unfolds through five psychological stages (Prochaska & DiClemente, 2005). It begins with precontemplation, a phase marked by denial, where the individual does not yet recognize the problem. This is followed by contemplation, during which the person starts weighing the costs of their substance use. The preparation stage comes next, when decisions are clarified and concrete plans are made. The action stage involves visible lifestyle changes, and finally, maintenance focuses on sustaining these changes and preventing relapse.<\/p>

According to Egunjobi (2020), the link between this internal process and the external environment is shaped by the need for increasingly greater resources as individuals recognize the limits of their own willpower. In the early stages of precontemplation and contemplation, self-help serves as the initial strategy, with individuals attempting to address the problem independently, relying on personal commitment. However, the chronic nature of addiction often makes personal resources insufficient. This moment, initially perceived as failure, then oftentimes becomes the driving force that pushes the person toward the higher levels of the hierarchy: relational help and later professional help. This transition generally occurs between the preparation and action stages, when the complexity of the condition requires clinical expertise and structured social support. Recovery often ultimately extends into a spiritual or existential dimension, represented by transcendental help. In the advanced action and maintenance stages, when individuals feel they have reached their limits or fear of relapse persists, many turn to this highest level of the support hierarchy. Doing so provides the spiritual stability needed to sustain lasting change and integrate recovery into everyday life.<\/p><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Identity and Its Impact on Help Levels in Addiction Recovery<\/h1>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Identity is understood as a complex construct that reflects how people perceive themselves, including self-related beliefs, emotions, mechanisms of self-reflection, and the integration of these aspects into behaviour and social relationships (McAdams et al., 2021). As such, identity structure can either support recovery or act as a barrier (Gligorov & Cowman, 2025). For example, White et al. (2003) observed that individuals with an informational identity style, characterized by self-analysis and active problem-solving, tend to make greater progress and maintain longer periods of abstinence because they consciously rebuild their lives. In contrast, those with a diffuse-avoidant style, who postpone important decisions and ignore personal conflicts or identity issues, show poorer recovery outcomes and a higher risk of relapse.<\/p>

At the initial self-help level, two dimensions of identity are particularly relevant for treatment success: self-concept\/self-schema and self-efficacy. Individuals with addictions often possess a self-concept dominated by the \u201cuser\u201d or \u201cdependent\u201d schema, while other schemas (e.g., self as professional, parent, friend) become significantly weakened (Corte, 2007). This identity configuration makes recovery more difficult. Treatment success therefore depends on reducing this dependency-based schema and developing healthier, non-addictive self-schemas that offer alternative sources of personal value. The influence of self-efficacy, the belief in one’s ability to control substance use, can be twofold. Self-efficacy is a central mechanism predicting alcohol and substance use outcomes (Magill et al., 2025). The more confident individuals are in their ability to implement change strategies, the greater their chances of success. However, low self-efficacy regarding control can also be beneficial. When someone recognizes they cannot control their consumption (e.g., cannot drink \u201cjust one glass\u201d), they are more likely to accept the need for total abstinence (Fiorentine & Hillhouse, 2003). Thus, overcoming addiction involves a profound restructuring of how individuals perceive their abilities and identity, balancing confidence with the acceptance of personal limitations.<\/p>

At the level of social help, social identity becomes central. Dingle et al. (2015) argue that people often become addicted through the adoption of a group identity (e.g., peer groups that use substances), and treatment requires a transition from a \u201cuser identity\u201d to a \u201crecovery identity.\u201d Positive change occurs when individuals identify with groups that do not promote substance use (e.g., involvement in non-profit organizations), and this new identity becomes stronger than the influence of pro-use groups. Furthermore, social identity mapping (Beckwith et al., 2019) is a technique in which individuals create visual maps of their social groups, marking how important they are and whether members use substances. Those with fragmented networks or networks dominated by substance-using groups have a higher relapse risk. In contrast, increasing the number of healthy, non-using groups correlates with better mental health and higher abstinence rates.<\/p>

The third level involves specialized intervention. During this process, therapists or counsellors can support individuals by teaching effective coping strategies, such as time planning, engaging in enjoyable activities, or self-control (Younas et al., 2025), as well as developing self-efficacy, recovery identity, and social identity through group therapy (Pooler et al., 2014).<\/p>

The final self-help level is based on identifying with a set of spiritual beliefs. Addiction diminishes self-worth and damages identity integrity, while spirituality is perceived as a mechanism for repairing these negative effects (Snodgrass et al., 2024). Spiritual recovery aims to develop the self through three fundamental components: belonging to a community, which reduces isolation through connection with individuals who share similar experiences; service to others, through which individuals regain a sense of usefulness and self-esteem; and the personal search for meaning, an inner journey where individuals redefine their values and purpose (Egunjobi, 2020). Additionally, Witte et al. (2023) found that recovery identity is strongly linked to spiritual well-being. Individuals who actively embrace this identity tend to find more meaning and purpose in life. However, recovery identity does not appear to be associated with social quality of life or family functioning, suggesting that its primary impact is internal and spiritual.<\/p><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Conclusion<\/h1>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

From a practical perspective, recovery is a process of change, both externally, in relationships, and internally, in thoughts, attitudes, emotions, and identity. It is holistic, involving multiple life domains; client-centered, shaped by individual needs; and grounded in learning coping strategies that help individuals manage everyday stress adaptively. It also unfolds across several different stages through which a person may progress (Inanlou et al., 2020).<\/p>

Overall, identity structures play a crucial role in how individuals navigate the levels of self-help and strengthen their recovery from addiction. One\u2019s perception of the self shapes both the motivation for change and the ability to access adaptive resources. A flexible identity capable of integrating new values, roles, and support networks facilitates engagement in effective self-help strategies and reduces relapse risk. In contrast, rigid identities dominated by the \u201cdependent person\u201d schema or by membership in substance-using groups can hinder progress and obstruct access to necessary support.<\/p><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

References<\/h2>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Beckwith, M., Best, D., Savic, M., Haslam, C., Bathish, R., Dingle, G., Mackenzie, J., Staiger, P. K., & Lubman, D. I. (2019). Social identity mapping in addiction recovery (SIM-AR): extension and application of a visual method. Addiction Research & Theory, 27(6), 462\u2013471. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/16066359.2018.1544623<\/a><\/p>\n

Corte, C. (2007). Schema model of the self-concept to examine the role of the Self-Concept in alcohol dependence and recovery. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 13(1), 31\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1078390307301738<\/a><\/p>\n

Dennis, M. L., Scott, C. K., Funk, R., & Foss, M. A. (2005). The<\/b> duration and correlates of addiction and treatment careers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 28(2), S51\u2013S62. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsat.2004.10.013<\/a><\/p>\n

Dingle, G. A., Cruwys, T., & Frings, D. (2015). Social identities as pathways into and out of addiction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1795. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2015.01795<\/a><\/p>\n

Egunjobi, J. P. (2020). Hierarchy of help model in addiction. African Journal of Alcohol & Drug Abuse, 3, 73\u201384.<\/p>\n

Fiorentine, R., & Hillhouse, M. P. (2003). When low self-efficacy is efficacious: Toward an addicted-self model of cessation of alcohol-and drug-dependent behavior. American Journal on Addictions, 12(4), 346\u2013364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10550490390226932<\/a><\/p>\n

Gligorov, N., & Cowan, E. (2025). The role of identity crises in addiction and recovery. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 42(3), 1059\u20131075. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/japp.70006<\/a><\/p>\n

Inanlou, M., Bahmani, B., Farhoudian, A., & Rafiee, F. (2020). Addiction recovery: A systematized review. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 15(2), 172\u2013181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18502\/ijps.v15i2.2691<\/a><\/p>\n

Laudet, A. B. (2007). What does recovery mean to you? Lessons from the recovery experience for research and practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(3), 243\u2013256. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsat.2007.04.014<\/a><\/p>\n

Magill, M., Meisel, S., Moniz-Lewis, D. I., Maisto, S., & Witkiewitz, K. (2025). Self-efficacy as a mechanism of behavior change in addiction science and practice. Current Addiction Reports, 12(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40429-025-00632-z<\/a><\/p>\n

McAdams, D. P., Trzesniewski, K., Lilgendahl, J., Benet-Martinez, V., & Robins, R. W. (2021). Self and identity in personality psychology. Personality Science, 2(1), Article e6035. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5964\/ps.6035<\/a><\/p>\n

Pooler, D. K., Qualls, N., Rogers, R., & Johnston, D. (2014). An exploration of cohesion and recovery outcomes in addiction treatment groups. Social work with Groups, 37(4), 314\u2013330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01609513.2014.905217<\/a><\/p>\n

Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (2005). “The transtheoretical approach”. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration. Oxford.<\/p>\n

Shdaifat, E., Alotaibi, A., Alshowkan, A., AlKhunaizi, A., & Abu-Sneineh, F. (2025). Understanding the effects of volunteering on well-being: subjective, psychological, and social well-being, gratitude, and loneliness. BMC Public Health, 25(1), Article 4051. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12889-025-25396-z<\/a><\/p>\n

Snodgrass, S., Corcoran, L., & Jerry, P. (2024). Spirituality in addiction recovery: A narrative review. Journal of Religion and Health, 63(1), 515\u2013530. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10943-023-01854-z<\/a><\/p>\n

White, J. M., Montgomery, M. J., Wampler, R. S., & Fischer, J. L. (2003). Recovery from alcohol or drug abuse: The relationship between identity styles and recovery behaviors. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 3(4), 325\u2013345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/S1532706XID0304_02<\/a><\/p>\n

Witte, T., Amick, M., & Smith, J. (2023). Recovery identity and psychosocial-spiritual health: A survey of individuals in remission from substance use disorders. Journal of Drug Issues, 53(3), 440\u2013450. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00220426221133039<\/a><\/p>\n

Younas, M., Sultan, M., Khan, N., & Hussain, M. (2025). From addiction to recovery: The role of personal coping mechanisms in preventing relapse among recovering drug users. Social Science Review Archives, 3(4), 1072\u20131078. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.70670\/sra.v3i4.1200<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t

About the Author<\/h3>\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Adrian Hebean is a 3rd year student at a university in Romania. He is passionate about clinical psychology and interventions for people with addictions. In this article, he was inspired by the internal acceptance processes that a person goes through during recovery from an addiction and he tried to argue that recovery is an identity-dependent process and at the same time a change of identity. His goal was to express these ideas and help raise awareness about addictions in contemporary society.<\/p><\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Help-Seeking in Addiction Recovery Recovery from addiction isn\u2019t just about quitting\u2013it\u2019s about rediscovering and reshaping who you are. Your identity influences every step, from relying on your own willpower to seeking support from others or finding meaning through community and spirituality. At the same time, the recovery process itself transforms your sense of self, building strength, purpose, and resilience. In other words, overcoming addiction is as much about changing habits as it is about changing identity. Addiction is a chronic condition characterized by episodes of relapse even after treatment has begun, with many years often required before achieving stable abstinence (Dennis et al., 2005). Thus, recovery from addiction is a complex process that involves attaining psychological, physiological, and social well-being\u2013the individual manages to abstain from use, improves their mental health, and reintegrates into society (Laudet, 2007). This journey can be shaped by both internal (personal) and external (social) resources (Inanlou et al., 2020). On a personal level, success is influenced by psychological factors such as self-acceptance, hope, responsibility, identity formation, and the ability to manage trauma, while socially, support comes from family and the community. Social integration is strengthened through participation in meaningful activities such volunteering, which offer a sense of belonging and a clear purpose (Shdaifat et al., 2025). To better understand how recovery works and why it differs from person to person, Egunjobi (2020) proposes a model suggesting that help-seeking is not chaotic but follows a hierarchy based on an individual\u2019s resources. The first level is self-help, where the person acknowledges the problem and attempts to address it independently. This relies on willpower, self-commitment, and personal strategies to avoid the addictive substance or behaviour. The next level involves relational help, where the person realizes they cannot cope alone and turns to close others. This stage is based on acknowledging vulnerability and seeking support from trusted individuals. The third level is professional help, where the individual accepts the situation and becomes willing to seek assistance from experts (medical interventions, psychotherapy, specialized counselling) to obtain information and resources that neither they nor those close to them possess. The final level is represented by transcendental or divine help, which the person turns to when they feel that all other methods have failed, placing their hope in a higher power or in destiny. Thus, recovery is a gradual, individualized process grounded in self-help strategies, where setbacks at one stage should not be viewed as hopelessness or incapacity but rather as motivation to move to the next level and access new resources. Also, according to the model (Egunjobi, 2020), the person starts at a lower level of help (the personal level) until they manage to find the resources needed for recovery, without necessarily having to go through all four stages to recover. The Dynamics of Recovery: Connecting Internal and External Resources Behavioural transformation unfolds through five psychological stages (Prochaska & DiClemente, 2005). It begins with precontemplation, a phase marked by denial, where the individual does not yet recognize the problem. This is followed by contemplation, during which the person starts weighing the costs of their substance use. The preparation stage comes next, when decisions are clarified and concrete plans are made. The action stage involves visible lifestyle changes, and finally, maintenance focuses on sustaining these changes and preventing relapse. According to Egunjobi (2020), the link between this internal process and the external environment is shaped by the need for increasingly greater resources as individuals recognize the limits of their own willpower. In the early stages of precontemplation and contemplation, self-help serves as the initial strategy, with individuals attempting to address the problem independently, relying on personal commitment. However, the chronic nature of addiction often makes personal resources insufficient. This moment, initially perceived as failure, then oftentimes becomes the driving force that pushes the person toward the higher levels of the hierarchy: relational help and later professional help. This transition generally occurs between the preparation and action stages, when the complexity of the condition requires clinical expertise and structured social support. Recovery often ultimately extends into a spiritual or existential dimension, represented by transcendental help. In the advanced action and maintenance stages, when individuals feel they have reached their limits or fear of relapse persists, many turn to this highest level of the support hierarchy. Doing so provides the spiritual stability needed to sustain lasting change and integrate recovery into everyday life. Identity and Its Impact on Help Levels in Addiction Recovery Identity is understood as a complex construct that reflects how people perceive themselves, including self-related beliefs, emotions, mechanisms of self-reflection, and the integration of these aspects into behaviour and social relationships (McAdams et al., 2021). As such, identity structure can either support recovery or act as a barrier (Gligorov & Cowman, 2025). For example, White et al. (2003) observed that individuals with an informational identity style, characterized by self-analysis and active problem-solving, tend to make greater progress and maintain longer periods of abstinence because they consciously rebuild their lives. In contrast, those with a diffuse-avoidant style, who postpone important decisions and ignore personal conflicts or identity issues, show poorer recovery outcomes and a higher risk of relapse. At the initial self-help level, two dimensions of identity are particularly relevant for treatment success: self-concept\/self-schema and self-efficacy. Individuals with addictions often possess a self-concept dominated by the \u201cuser\u201d or \u201cdependent\u201d schema, while other schemas (e.g., self as professional, parent, friend) become significantly weakened (Corte, 2007). This identity configuration makes recovery more difficult. Treatment success therefore depends on reducing this dependency-based schema and developing healthier, non-addictive self-schemas that offer alternative sources of personal value. The influence of self-efficacy, the belief in one’s ability to control substance use, can be twofold. Self-efficacy is a central mechanism predicting alcohol and substance use outcomes (Magill et al., 2025). The more confident individuals are in their ability to implement change strategies, the greater their chances of success. However, low self-efficacy regarding control can also be beneficial. When someone recognizes they cannot control their consumption (e.g., cannot drink \u201cjust one glass\u201d), they are more likely to accept the need for total abstinence (Fiorentine & Hillhouse, 2003). Thus, overcoming addiction involves a profound restructuring of how individuals perceive their abilities and identity, balancing confidence with the acceptance of personal limitations. At the level of social help, social identity becomes central. Dingle et al. (2015) argue that people often become addicted through the adoption of a group identity (e.g., peer groups that use substances), and treatment requires a transition from a \u201cuser identity\u201d to a \u201crecovery identity.\u201d Positive change occurs when individuals identify with groups that do not promote substance use (e.g., involvement in non-profit organizations), and this new identity becomes stronger than the influence of pro-use groups. Furthermore, social identity mapping (Beckwith et al., 2019) is a technique in which individuals create visual maps of their social groups, marking how important they are and whether members use substances. Those with fragmented networks or networks dominated by substance-using groups have a higher relapse risk. In contrast, increasing the number of healthy, non-using groups correlates with better mental health and higher abstinence rates. The third level involves specialized intervention. During this process, therapists or counsellors can support individuals by teaching effective coping strategies, such as time planning, engaging in enjoyable activities, or self-control (Younas et al., 2025), as well as developing self-efficacy, recovery identity, and social identity through group therapy (Pooler et al., 2014). The final self-help level is based on identifying with a set of spiritual beliefs. Addiction diminishes self-worth and damages identity integrity, while spirituality is perceived as a mechanism for repairing these negative effects (Snodgrass et al., 2024). Spiritual recovery aims to develop the self through three fundamental components: belonging to a community, which reduces isolation through connection with individuals who share similar experiences; service to others, through which individuals regain a sense of usefulness and self-esteem; and the personal search for meaning, an inner journey where individuals redefine their values and purpose (Egunjobi, 2020). Additionally, Witte et al. (2023) found that recovery identity is strongly linked to spiritual well-being. Individuals who actively embrace this identity tend to find more meaning and purpose in life. However, recovery identity does not appear to be associated with social quality of life or family functioning, suggesting that its primary impact is internal and spiritual. Conclusion From a practical perspective, recovery is a process of change, both externally, in relationships, and internally, in thoughts, attitudes, emotions, and identity. It is holistic, involving multiple life domains; client-centered, shaped by individual needs; and grounded in learning coping strategies that help individuals manage everyday stress adaptively. It also unfolds across several different stages through which a person may progress (Inanlou et al., 2020). Overall, identity structures play a crucial role in how individuals navigate the levels of self-help and strengthen their recovery from addiction. One\u2019s perception of the self shapes both the motivation for change and the ability to access adaptive resources. A flexible identity capable of integrating new values, roles, and support networks facilitates engagement in effective self-help strategies and reduces relapse risk. In contrast, rigid identities dominated by the \u201cdependent person\u201d schema or by membership in substance-using groups can hinder progress and obstruct access to necessary support. References Beckwith, M., Best, D., Savic, M., Haslam, C., Bathish, R., Dingle, G., Mackenzie, J., Staiger, P. K., & Lubman, D. I. (2019). Social identity mapping in addiction recovery (SIM-AR): extension and application of a visual method. Addiction Research & Theory, 27(6), 462\u2013471. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/16066359.2018.1544623 Corte, C. (2007). Schema model of the self-concept to examine the role of the Self-Concept in alcohol dependence and recovery. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 13(1), 31\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1078390307301738 Dennis, M. L., Scott, C. K., Funk, R., & Foss, M. A. (2005). The duration and correlates of addiction and treatment careers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 28(2), S51\u2013S62. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsat.2004.10.013 Dingle, G. A., Cruwys, T., & Frings, D. (2015). Social identities as pathways into and out of addiction. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1795. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2015.01795 Egunjobi, J. P. (2020). Hierarchy of help model in addiction. African Journal of Alcohol & Drug Abuse, 3, 73\u201384. Fiorentine, R., & Hillhouse, M. P. (2003). When low self-efficacy is efficacious: Toward an addicted-self model of cessation of alcohol-and drug-dependent behavior. American Journal on Addictions, 12(4), 346\u2013364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10550490390226932 Gligorov, N., & Cowan, E. (2025). The role of identity crises in addiction and recovery. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 42(3), 1059\u20131075. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/japp.70006 Inanlou, M., Bahmani, B., Farhoudian, A., & Rafiee, F. (2020). Addiction recovery: A systematized review. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 15(2), 172\u2013181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18502\/ijps.v15i2.2691 Laudet, A. B. (2007). What does recovery mean to you? Lessons from the recovery experience for research and practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(3), 243\u2013256. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsat.2007.04.014 Magill, M., Meisel, S., Moniz-Lewis, D. I., Maisto, S., & Witkiewitz, K. (2025). Self-efficacy as a mechanism of behavior change in addiction science and practice. Current Addiction Reports, 12(1). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40429-025-00632-z McAdams, D. P., Trzesniewski, K., Lilgendahl, J., Benet-Martinez, V., & Robins, R. W. (2021). Self and identity in personality psychology. Personality Science, 2(1), Article e6035. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5964\/ps.6035 Pooler, D. K., Qualls, N., Rogers, R., & Johnston, D. (2014). An exploration of cohesion and recovery outcomes in addiction treatment groups. Social work with Groups, 37(4), 314\u2013330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01609513.2014.905217 Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (2005). “The transtheoretical approach”. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration. Oxford. Shdaifat, E., Alotaibi, A., Alshowkan, A., AlKhunaizi, A., & Abu-Sneineh, F. (2025). Understanding the effects of volunteering on well-being: subjective, psychological, and social well-being, gratitude, and loneliness. BMC Public Health, 25(1), Article 4051. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12889-025-25396-z Snodgrass, S., Corcoran, L., & Jerry, P. (2024). Spirituality in addiction recovery: A narrative review. Journal of Religion and Health, 63(1), 515\u2013530. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10943-023-01854-z White, J. M., Montgomery, M. J., Wampler, R. S., & Fischer, J. L. (2003). Recovery from alcohol or drug abuse: The relationship between identity styles and recovery behaviors. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 3(4), 325\u2013345. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/S1532706XID0304_02 Witte, T., Amick, M., & Smith, J. (2023). Recovery identity and psychosocial-spiritual health: A survey of individuals in remission from substance use disorders. Journal of Drug Issues, 53(3),…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11730,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[84],"tags":[112,136,103,134,135],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/more.efpsa.org\/rpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1238"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/more.efpsa.org\/rpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/more.efpsa.org\/rpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/more.efpsa.org\/rpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11730"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/more.efpsa.org\/rpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1238"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/more.efpsa.org\/rpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1238\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1255,"href":"https:\/\/more.efpsa.org\/rpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1238\/revisions\/1255"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/more.efpsa.org\/rpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1238"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/more.efpsa.org\/rpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1238"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/more.efpsa.org\/rpblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1238"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}